Pacquiao Wins, Larios Classy in Defeat

In a moment of clarity, and for the first time in the fight, Oscar Larios knew exactly what he had to do. Lashing out with a left hook and following up with a spearing right, he had Manny Pacquiao, the reigning WBC International super featherweight champ, on the ropes early in the third round.

Unfortunately, all glassy-eyed and stunned, Pacquiao had his moment of clarity as well.

It is perhaps to Paquiao’s discredit that it was only then that he took Larios – a fierce competitor and as classy a fighter if there ever was one – seriously. Behind in points by then and fighting to keep the Mexican at bay until he could regain his senses, the PacMan turned on the switch.

By the seventh round, a right hook followed by a massive left cross by Pacquiao sent Larios down, and it was something the Mexican would never recover from. His confidence was gone, and the flurry of blows and in-fighting techinques that are Chololo’s trademark have left him. Larios was never noted for his power, and when he began swinging only with his right hand, the fight was over.

When the twelfth bell rang, it was almost a formality, although I disagree with commentator Sev Sarmienta’s account that Pacquio was toying with Larios. While never giving as good as he got, he took Pacquiao’s blows head on and never quit. It is a testament not only to his training, but to his heart. And while moral victories don’t show up on the stats sheet, sometimes, how you play the game counts.

Post-fight thoughts

This is a fight of contrasts and ironies: Pacquiao was clearly the better fighter but Larios had more heart: a state of affairs that is often the reverse whenever Pacquiao steps into the ring. Larios came in as a boxer known for his inside fighting skills, and despite his lack of power, is more than capable of scoring a knockout because he could let loose an astonishing barrage of punches. Pacquiao has the reputation for being a brawler and heavy hitter, but not much of a ring tactician. What we saw in the fight was a Larios unable to conistently land his combinations and a Pacquiao counter-punching, dodging, waving, and basically out-boxing Larios.

I am disappointed in Pacquiao’s attitude though, winning AND losing. Be a gracious winner for a change and stop bragging about how Larios’ hits never fazed you. Bravado is all well and good, but when the loser is as classy as Larios has shown himself to be, you’re just making yourself look like an ass. And enough of the “I’m doing this so the country can be united” angle, ok? As glad as I am to see you win, let’s drop the bullshit :D

As tune-up matches go, I’m glad this wasn’t another farce like the Fashan “3K Battery” fight; by fighting a great boxer in Larios, it more than confirms the assertion that Manny’s win over Morales last January (Pacquiao – Morales II) was not a fluke. It also makes the Pacquiao – Morales tiff on the 18th of November (tentatively) an even better fight, a true rivalry between the best fighters in the world.

Related posts:

  1. Coming With Everything
  2. Oscar Larios, Tale of the Tape: A Boxing Preview
  3. The Finale: No More Excuses
  4. Manny Pacquiao, Tale of the Tape: A Boxing Preview
  5. Morales by Unanimous Decision, 115-113

7 Comments

1:32 am Monday, 3rd 2006f July, 2006

I agree with on you on two counts — Sev Sarmenta’s “toying” comment is crap, and the Fashan fight was crap, too. ;) Larios was a ‘tune-up’ worthy opponent, unlike Hector Velasquez (IMHO).

6:11 am Monday, 3rd 2006f July, 2006

heh, I totally didn’t even bother watching the Pacquiao – Velasquez fight, even though (I think) Morales was also carded in that event.

10:07 pm Wednesday, 5th 2006f July, 2006

it was good the fight lasted the full 12 rounds. paquiao needs the tune up for morales, with all the distractions in his life. paquiao the boxer will be beaten by paquiao the endorsement king. a loss will be good for him, to get him hungry again and to save face and get back bigger endorsements.

11:21 pm Wednesday, 5th 2006f July, 2006

I couldn’t agree more Boy G; he was in top form against Morales because he felt he had a score to settle. Thanks for dropping by! :)

6:21 am Tuesday, 11th 2006f July, 2006

I couldn’t disagree more, all you guys must be mexican because I believe Pacman can say what he wants and it doesn’t make him arogant. If the punches didn’t hurt they didn’t hurt how does that tell you he’s bragging. You must be Mexican not to like Pacman attitude.

8:46 am Tuesday, 11th 2006f July, 2006

Thanks for visiting Tran; let me assure you that I’m 100% Filipino, but that doesn’t translate to blind loyalty to Pacquiao :) I just didn’t like the ‘tude.

2:02 am Sunday, 16th 2006f July, 2006
Warrior-Spectator

ATTITUDE? its boxing man. There not there to say ( ”oooo im sorry for hitting you! are you alright?) Do you get why boxers need the attitude now? They’re not a meeting or church dude. Theyre fighting not making love on ring..fans love a show and he performed the way boxing is all about.

Post a Comment

*
*

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.